Relevant
books
available at Amazon
Many
Cyril
translations
and studies
with links to Amazon
 
John McGuckin -----
 
Norman Russell -----
 
Susan Wessel |
To the most religious and beloved of God, fellow
minister Nestorius, Cyril sends greeting in the Lord.
I hear that some are rashly talking of the estimation in which I hold your
holiness, and that this is frequently the case especially at the times that
meetings are held of those in authority. And perchance they think in so doing to
say something agreeable to you, but they speak senselessly, for they have
suffered no injustice at my hands, but have been exposed by me only to their
profit; this man as an oppressor of the blind and needy, and that as one who
wounded his mother with a sword. Another because he stole, in collusion with his
waiting maid, another’s money, and had always laboured under the imputation of
such like crimes as no one would wish even one of his bitterest enemies to be
laden with. I take little reckoning of the words of such people, for the
disciple is not above his Master, nor would I stretch the measure of my narrow
brain above the Fathers, for no matter what path of life one pursues it is
hardly possible to escape the smirching of the wicked, whose mouths are full of
cursing and bitterness, and who at the last must give an account to the Judge of
all. But I return to the point which especially I had in mind. And now I urge
you, as a brother in the Lord, to propose the word of teaching and the doctrine
of the faith with all accuracy to the people, and to consider that the giving of
scandal to one even of the least of those who believe in Christ, exposes a body
to the unbearable indignation of God. And of how great diligence and skill there
is need when the multitude of those grieved is so great, so that we may
administer the healing word of truth to them that seek it. But this we shall
accomplish most excellently if we shall turn over the words of the holy Fathers,
and are zealous to obey their commands, proving ourselves, whether we be in the
faith according to that which is written, and conform our thoughts to their
upright and irreprehensible teaching.
The holy and great Synod therefore says, that the only begotten Son, born
according to nature of God the Father, very God of very God, Light of Light, by
whom the Father made all things, came down, and was incarnate, and was made man,
suffered, and rose again the third day, and ascended into heaven. These words
and these decrees we ought to follow, considering what is meant by the Word of
God being incarnate and made man. For we do not say that the nature of the Word
was changed and became flesh, or that it was converted into a whole man
consisting of soul and body; but rather that the Word having personally united
to himself flesh animated by a rational soul, did in an ineffable and
inconceivable manner become man, and was called the Son of Man, not merely as
willing or being pleased to be so called, neither on account of taking to
himself a person, but because the two natures being brought together in a true
union, there is of both one Christ and one Son; for the difference of the
natures is not taken away by the union, but rather the divinity and the humanity
make perfect for us the one Lord Jesus Christ by their ineffable and
inexpressible union. So then he who had an existence before all ages and was
born of the Father, is said to have been born according to the flesh of a woman,
not as though his divine nature received its beginning of existence in the holy
Virgin, for it needed not any second generation after that of the Father (for it
would be absurd and foolish to say that he who existed before all ages,
coeternal with the Father, needed any second beginning of existence), but since,
for us and for our salvation, he personally united to himself an human body, and
came forth of a woman, he is in this way said to be born after the flesh; for he
was not first born a common man of the holy Virgin, and then the Word came down
and entered into him, but the union being made in the womb itself, he is said to
endure a birth after the flesh, ascribing to himself the birth of his own flesh.
On this account we say that he suffered and rose again; not as if God the Word
suffered in his own nature stripes, or the piercing of the nails, or any other
wounds, for the Divine nature is incapable of suffering, inasmuch as it is
incorporeal, but since that which had become his own body suffered in this way,
he is also said to suffer for us; for he who is in himself incapable of
suffering was in a suffering body. In the same manner also we conceive
respecting his dying; for the Word of God is by nature immortal and
incorruptible, and life and life-giving; since, however, his own body did, as
Paul says, by the grace of God taste death for every man, he himself is said to
have suffered death for us, not as if he had any experience of death in his own
nature (for it would be madness to say or think this), but because, as I have
just said, his flesh tasted death. In like manner his flesh being raised again,
it is spoken of as his resurrection, not as if he had fallen into corruption
(God forbid), but because his own body was raised again. We, therefore, confess
one Christ and Lord, not as worshipping a man with the Word (lest this
expression “with the Word” should suggest to the mind the idea of division), but
worshipping him as one and the same, forasmuch as the body of the Word, with
which he sits with the Father, is not separated from the Word himself, not as if
two sons were sitting with him, but one by the union with the flesh. If,
however, we reject the personal union as impossible or unbecoming, we fall into
the error of speaking of two sons, for it will be necessary to distinguish, and
to say, that he who was properly man was honoured with the appellation of Son,
and that he who is properly the Word of God, has by nature both the name and the
reality of Sonship. We must not, therefore, divide the one Lord Jesus Christ
into two Sons. Neither will it at all avail to a sound faith to hold, as some
do, an union of persons; for the Scripture has not said that the Word united to
himself the person of man, but that he was made flesh. This expression, however,
“the Word was made flesh,” can mean nothing else but that he partook of flesh
and blood like to us; he made our body his own, and came forth man from a woman,
not casting off his existence as God, or his generation of God the Father, but
even in taking to himself flesh remaining what he was. This the declaration of
the correct faith proclaims everywhere. This was the sentiment of the holy
Fathers; therefore they ventured to call the holy Virgin, the Mother of God, not
as if the nature of the Word or his divinity had its beginning from the holy
Virgin, but because of her was born that holy body with a rational soul, to
which the Word being personally united is said to be born according to the
flesh. These things, therefore, I now write unto you for the love of Christ,
beseeching you as a brother, and testifying to you before Christ and the elect
angels, that you would both think and teach these things with us, that the peace
of the Churches may be preserved and the bond of concord and love continue
unbroken amongst the Priests of God. Send greetings to the brothers who are with
you. Those who are with me send greetings in Christ.
|
