One of the most extensive resources on the internet 
for the study of early Christianity
“Eusebius - The Two Theodoti: Historia Ecclesiastica, 5.28”
About Theodotus the Cobbler and Theodotus the Banker, representatives of a second century "adoptionist" school of Christology.
| 
 This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more about our use of cookies here. Click here to read at earlychurchtexts.com in the original Greek (with dictionary lookup links). The English translation below is from the NPNF series. earlychurchtexts.com 
  
      Try out the feature 
      rich subscription version of the Early Church Texts website for just $5 
      for a trial period or $30 for a year ($15 student rate). Click
      
      here for more information. Check out the video demo of the site. Click here to go to the Early Church Texts Home Page 
    for the publicly available version of the site which has just the original Greek and Latin texts with dictionary lookup links.   | 
    
     Relevant 
    books Eusebius studies and translations Several also below TEXTS & TRANSLATIONS History of the Church Andrew Louth ed. ----- Cameron and Hall ----- ----- W. J. Ferrar ----- 
    Eusebii Pamphili Evangelicae Praeparations, Tomus I (Greek Edition)  ----- 
    Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea - the Ecclesiastical History and the Martyrs of Palestine. Two Volumes ----- ----- Notley and Safrai ----- STUDIES Eusebius, Christianity and Judaism Harold W. Attridge ----- Constantine and Eusebius Timothy Barnes ----- Glenn Chesnut ----- Robert Grant ----- Eusebius of Caesarea Against Paganism Aryeh Kofsky -----  Eusebius of Caesarea and the Arian Crisis C. Luibheid ----- Christ as Mediator: A Study of the Theologies of Eusebius of Caesarea, 
    Marcellus of Ancyra, and Athanasius of Alexandria ----- Wallace-Hadrill 
  | 
     1. In a laborious work by one of these writers against the heresy of Artemon, 
    which Paul of Samosata attempted to revive again in our day, there is an 
    account appropriate to the history which we are now examining.
    2. For he criticises, as a late innovation, the above-mentioned heresy which 
    teaches that the Saviour was a mere man, because they were attempting to 
    magnify it as ancient. Having given in his work many other arguments in 
    refutation of their blasphemous falsehood, he adds the following words:
    3. “For they say that all the early teachers and the apostles received and 
    taught what they now declare, and that the truth of the Gospel was preserved 
    until the times of Victor, who was the thirteenth bishop of Rome from 
    Peter, but that from his successor, Zephyrinus, the truth had been 
    corrupted.
    4. And what they say might be plausible, if first of all the Divine 
    Scriptures did not contradict them. And there are writings of certain 
    brethren older than the times of Victor, which they wrote in behalf of the 
    truth against the heathen, and against the heresies which existed in their 
    day. I refer to Justin and Miltiades and Tatian and Clement 
    and many others, in all of whose works Christ is spoken of as God.
    5. For who does not know the works of Irenæus and of Melito and of 
    others which teach that Christ is God and man? And how many psalms and 
    hymns, written by the faithful brethren from the beginning, celebrate 
    Christ the Word of God, speaking of him as Divine.
    6. How then since the opinion held by the Church has been preached for so 
    many years, can its preaching have been delayed as they affirm, until the 
    times of Victor? And how is it that they are not ashamed to speak thus 
    falsely of Victor, knowing well that he cut off from communion Theodotus, 
    the cobbler, the leader and father of this God-denying apostasy, and the 
    first to declare that Christ is mere man? For if Victor agreed with their 
    opinions, as their slander affirms, how came he to cast out Theodotus, the 
    inventor of this heresy?”
    7. So much in regard to Victor. His bishopric lasted ten years, and 
    Zephyrinus was appointed his successor about the ninth year of the reign of 
    Severus. The author of the above-mentioned book, concerning the founder 
    of this heresy, narrates another event which occurred in the time of Zephyrinus, using these words:
    8. “I will remind many of the brethren of a fact which took place in our 
    time, which, had it happened in Sodom, might, I think, have proved a warning 
    to them. There was a certain confessor, Natalius, not long ago, but in 
    our own day.
    9. This man was deceived at one time by Asclepiodotus and another Theodotus, a money-changer. Both of them were disciples of Theodotus, 
    the cobbler, who, as I have said, was the first person excommunicated by 
    Victor, bishop at that time, on account of this sentiment, or rather 
    senselessness.
    10. Natalius was persuaded by them to allow himself to be chosen bishop of 
    this heresy with a salary, to be paid by them, of one hundred and fifty 
    denarii a month.
    11. When he had thus connected himself with them, he was warned oftentimes 
    by the Lord through visions. For the compassionate God and our Lord Jesus 
    Christ was not willing that a witness of his own sufferings, being cast out 
    of the Church, should perish.
    12. But as he paid little regard to the visions, because he was ensnared by 
    the first position among them and by that shameful covetousness which 
    destroys a great many, he was scourged by holy angels, and punished severely 
    through the entire night. Thereupon having risen in the morning, he put 
    on sackcloth and covered himself with ashes, and with great haste and tears 
    he fell down before Zephyrinus, the bishop, rolling at the feet not only of 
    the clergy, but also of the laity; and he moved with his tears the 
    compassionate Church of the merciful Christ. And though he used much 
    supplication, and showed the welts of the stripes which he had received, yet 
    scarcely was he taken back into communion.” 
    13. We will add from the same writer some other extracts concerning them, 
    which run as follows:
    “They have treated the Divine Scriptures recklessly and without fear. They 
    have set aside the rule of ancient faith; and Christ they have not known. 
    They do not endeavor to learn what the Divine Scriptures declare, but strive 
    laboriously after any form of syllogism which may be devised to sustain 
    their impiety. And if any one brings before them a passage of Divine 
    Scripture, they see whether a conjunctive or disjunctive form of syllogism 
    can be made from it.
    14. And as being of the earth and speaking of the earth, and as ignorant of 
    him who cometh from above, they forsake the holy writings of God to devote 
    themselves to geometry. Euclid is laboriously measured by some of 
    them; and Aristotle and Theophrastus are admired; and Galen, perhaps, by 
    some is even worshiped.
    15. But that those who use the arts of unbelievers for their heretical 
    opinions and adulterate the simple faith of the Divine Scriptures by the 
    craft of the godless, are far from the faith, what need is there to say? 
    Therefore they have laid their hands boldly upon the Divine Scriptures, 
    alleging that they have corrected them.
    16. That I am not speaking falsely of them in this matter, whoever wishes 
    may learn. For if any one will collect their respective copies, and compare 
    them one with another, he will find that they differ greatly.
    17. Those of Asclepiades, for example, do not agree with those of Theodotus. And many of these can be obtained, because their disciples have 
    assiduously written the corrections, as they call them, that is the 
    corruptions, of each of them. Again, those of Hermophilus do not 
    agree with these, and those of Apollonides are not consistent with 
    themselves. For you can compare those prepared by them at an earlier date 
    with those which they corrupted later, and you will find them widely 
    different. 18. But how daring this offense is, it is not likely that they 
    themselves are ignorant. For either they do not believe that the Divine 
    Scriptures were spoken by the Holy Spirit, and thus are unbelievers, or else 
    they think themselves wiser than the Holy Spirit, and in that case what else 
    are they than demoniacs? For they cannot deny the commission of the crime, 
    since the copies have been written by their own hands. For they did not 
    receive such Scriptures from their instructors, nor can they produce any 
    copies from which they were transcribed.
    19. But some of them have not thought it worth while to corrupt them, but 
    simply deny the law and the prophets, and thus through their lawless and 
    impious teaching under pretense of grace, have sunk to the lowest depths of 
    perdition.” Let this suffice for these things.   | 
    
  
Mac Users please note that the site may not work with Safari versions lower than version 4. (It has been tested with version 4.0.3.) It will work with Firefox, which can be downloaded from here.
Please note that for all features of the site to work correctly javascript must be enabled and the operation of "pop-up" windows must not be blocked. Click here for more information.
Theodotus the Cobbler
Theodotus the Banker
Theodotus of Byzantium
Adoptionist Christology
Monarchianism
Victor
Zephyrinus
Θεόδοτος