| 
    
 
 Many Jerome 
    translations and studies with links to Amazon 
    -------- 
    
    STUDIES 
    (Click on images below.) 
    
      
     The Monk and the Book: 
    Jerome and the Making of Christian Scholarship 
    Megan Hale Williams -------- 
      
     Jerome:  
    His Life, Writings, and Controversies 
    J. N. D. Kelly -------- 
      
     Saint Jerome in the Renaissance 
    Eugene F. Rice -------- 
      
     Jerome (The Early Church Fathers) 
    Stefan Rebenich --------   
     | 
 LETTER XV. 
TO POPE DAMASUS. 
 
This letter, written in 376 or 377 A.D., illustrates Jerome’s attitude 
towards the see of Rome at this time held by Damasus, afterwards his warm friend 
and admirer. Referring to Rome as the scene of his own baptism and as a church 
where the true faith has remained unimpaired (§1), and laying down the strict 
doctrine of salvation only within the pale of the church (§2), Jerome asks “the 
successor of the fisherman” two questions, viz.: (1) who is the true bishop of 
the three claimants of the see of Antioch, and (2) which is the correct 
terminology, to speak of three “hypostases” in the Godhead, or of one? On the 
latter question he expresses fully his own opinion. 
 
1. Since the East, shattered as it is by the long-standing feuds, subsisting 
between its peoples, is bit by bit tearing into shreds the seamless vest of the 
Lord, “woven from the top throughout,” since the foxes are destroying the 
vineyard of Christ, and since among the broken cisterns that hold no water it is 
hard to discover “the sealed fountain” and “the garden inclosed,” I think it my 
duty to consult the chair of Peter, and to turn to a church whose faith has been 
praised by Paul. I appeal for spiritual food to the church whence I have 
received the garb of Christ. The wide space of sea and land that lies between us 
cannot deter me from searching for “the pearl of great price.” “Wheresoever the 
body is, there will the eagles be gathered together.” Evil children have 
squandered their patrimony; you alone keep your heritage intact. The fruitful 
soil of Rome, when it receives the pure seed of the Lord, bears fruit an 
hundredfold; but here the seed corn is choked in the furrows and nothing grows 
but darnel or oats. In the West the Sun of righteousness is even now rising; in 
the East, Lucifer, who fell from heaven, has once more set his throne above the 
stars. “Ye are the light of the world,” “ye are the salt of the earth,” ye are 
“vessels of gold and of silver.” Here are vessels of wood or of earth, which 
wait for the rod of iron, and eternal fire. 
 
2. Yet, though your greatness terrifies me, your kindness attracts me. From the 
priest I demand the safe-keeping of the victim, from the shepherd the protection 
due to the sheep. Away with all that is overweening; let the state of Roman 
majesty withdraw. My words are spoken to the successor of the fisherman, to the 
disciple of the cross. As I follow no leader save Christ, so I communicate with 
none but your blessedness, that is with the chair of Peter. For this, I know, is 
the rock on which the church is built! This is the house where alone the paschal 
lamb can be rightly eaten. This is the ark of Noah, and he who is not found in 
it shall perish when the flood prevails. But since by reason of my sins I have 
betaken myself to this desert which lies between Syria and the uncivilized 
waste, I cannot, owing to the great distance between us, always ask of your 
sanctity the holy thing of the Lord. Consequently I here follow the Egyptian 
confessors who share your faith, and anchor my frail craft under the shadow of 
their great argosies. I know nothing of Vitalis; I reject Meletius; I have 
nothing to do with Paulinus. He that gathers not with you scatters; he that is 
not of Christ is of Antichrist. 
 
3. Just now, I am sorry to say, those Arians, the Campenses, are trying to 
extort from me, a Roman Christian, their unheard-of formula of three hypostases. 
And this, too, after the definition of Nicæa and the decree of Alexandria, in 
which the West has joined. Where, I should like to know, are the apostles of 
these doctrines? Where is their Paul, their new doctor of the Gentiles? I ask 
them what three hypostases are supposed to mean. They reply three persons 
subsisting. I rejoin that this is my belief. They are not satisfied with the 
meaning, they demand the term. Surely some secret venom lurks in the words. “If 
any man refuse,” I cry, “to acknowledge three hypostases in the sense of three 
things hypostatized, that is three persons subsisting, let him be anathema.” 
Yet, because I do not learn their words, I am counted a heretic. “But, if any 
one, understanding by hypostasis essence, deny that in the three persons there 
is one hypostasis, he has no part in Christ.” Because this is my confession I, 
like you, am branded with the stigma of Sabellianism. 
 
4. If you think fit enact a decree; and then I shall not hesitate to speak of 
three hypostases. Order a new creed to supersede the Nicene; and then, whether 
we are Arians or orthodox, one confession will do for us all. In the whole range 
of secular learning hypostasis never means anything but essence. And can any 
one, I ask, be so profane as to speak of three essences or substances in the 
Godhead? There is one nature of God and one only; and this, and this alone, 
truly is. For absolute being is derived from no other source but is all 
its own. All things besides, that is all things created, although they appear to 
be, are not. For there was a time when they were not, and that which once was 
not may again cease to be. God alone who is eternal, that is to say, who has no 
beginning, really deserves to be called an essence. Therefore also He says to 
Moses from the bush, “I am that I am,” and Moses says of Him, “I am hath sent 
me.” As the angels, the sky, the earth, the seas, all existed at the time, it 
must have been as the absolute being that God claimed for himself that name of 
essence, which apparently was common to all. But because His nature alone is 
perfect, and because in the three persons there subsists but one Godhead, which 
truly is and is one nature; whosoever in the name of religion declares that 
there are in the Godhead three elements, three hypostases, that is, or essences, 
is striving really to predicate three natures of God. And if this is true, why 
are we severed by walls from Arius, when in dishonesty we are one with him? Let 
Ursicinus be made the colleague of your blessedness; let Auxentius be associated 
with Ambrose. But may the faith of Rome never come to such a pass! May the 
devout hearts of your people never be infected with such unholy doctrines! Let 
us be satisfied to speak of one substance and of three subsisting 
persons—perfect, equal, coeternal. Let us keep to one hypostasis, if such be 
your pleasure, and say nothing of three. It is a bad sign when those who mean 
the same thing use different words. Let us be satisfied with the form of creed 
which we have hitherto used. Or, if you think it right that I should speak of 
three hypostases, explaining what I mean by them, I am ready to submit. But, 
believe me, there is poison hidden under their honey; the angel of Satan has 
transformed himself into an angel of light. They give a plausible explanation of 
the term hypostasis; yet when I profess to hold it in the same sense they count 
me a heretic. Why are they so tenacious of a word? Why do they shelter 
themselves under ambiguous language? If their belief corresponds to their 
explanation of it, I do not condemn them for keeping it. On the other hand, if 
my belief corresponds to their expressed opinions, they should allow me to set 
forth their meaning in my own words. 
 
5. I implore your blessedness, therefore, by the crucified Saviour of the world, 
and by the consubstantial trinity, to authorize me by letter either to use or to 
refuse this formula of three hypostases. And lest the obscurity of my present 
abode may baffle the bearers of your letter, I pray you to address it to 
Evagrius, the presbyter, with whom you are well acquainted. I beg you also to 
signify with whom I am to communicate at Antioch. Not, I hope, with the 
Campenses; for they—with their allies the heretics of Tarsus —only desire 
communion with you to preach with greater authority their traditional doctrine 
of three hypostases. 
 
 
   |